2.4 GHz: Crowded (microwaves/BT/Zigbee all operate here), good wall penetration
Channels 1~13 (China), only 3 non-overlapping channels (1/6/11)
5 GHz: Clean, many channels, large bandwidth, poor wall penetration
Many channels, can bond 80/160 MHz
6 GHz (WiFi 6E/7): New spectrum, almost no interference
But worse wall penetration, currently only for indoor use
OFDM / OFDMA
OFDM (WiFi 4/5): Occupies the entire channel for each transmission
→ Small packets also occupy the full channel, low efficiency
OFDMA (WiFi 6+): Divides the channel into RUs (Resource Units)
→ Multiple devices transmit simultaneously, similar to LTE
→ Significantly reduces latency and improves multi-device efficiency
Analogy: OFDM = single lane, OFDMA = multi-lane highway
MIMO / MU-MIMO
MIMO: Multiple antennas transmit and receive simultaneously
2×2: 2 transmit, 2 receive (common in phones/laptops)
4×4: 4 transmit, 4 receive (high-end routers)
MU-MIMO: Simultaneously sends data to multiple clients
WiFi 5: Downlink only, WiFi 6: Supports both uplink and downlink
MLO (Multi-Link Operation) — WiFi 7
Simultaneously uses multiple bands (2.4G + 5G + 6G) for transmission
→ Higher throughput + lower latency + better reliability
→ If one band is interfered with, seamlessly switch to another
Bluetooth (Bluetooth)
Classic vs BLE
Feature
BR/EDR (Classic)
BLE (Low Energy)
Physical Channels
79 x 1MHz
40 x 2MHz
Rate
1~3 Mbps
125kbps~2Mbps
Power Consumption
~1W (continuous)
~0.01~0.5W
Latency
~100ms
~3ms
Topology
Piconet
Star/Broadcast/Mesh
Audio
A2DP/HFP
LE Audio (LC3)
Typical Applications
Speakers/Headphones/Car Infotainment
Wearables/IoT/Beacons
BLE Versions
4.0: Basic BLE
4.2: Security enhancements, packet length extension
5.0: 2M PHY, long-range coding, extended advertising
5.1: Direction finding (AoA/AoD → centimeter-level positioning)
5.2: LE Audio, Isochronous Channels (for TWS earbuds)
5.3: Channel classification, connection subevents
5.4: Periodic advertising sync (for electronic shelf labels)
Actually, BLE 4.2 is sufficient for most scenarios.
5.0+ mainly brings: faster, longer range, more power-efficient.
BLE Connection Flow
Classic Bluetooth vs BLE Selection Guide
Continuous Audio → Classic (A2DP)
Occasional Data + Low Power → BLE
Need iOS Background Communication → BLE (Apple favors BLE)
HID Keyboards/Mice → BLE (HID over GATT)
File Transfer → Classic (or WiFi Direct)
TWS Earbuds → BLE 5.2+ (LE Audio)
WiFi and Bluetooth Coexistence
Co-frequency Interference
2.4GHz is the battlefield for WiFi + BT + Zigbee + Thread + Microwaves
WiFi and BT are in the same device:
→ Time Division Multiplexing (TDM): Alternating use of antennas
→ Coexistence Interface: Bluetooth tells WiFi "I'm about to send a packet", WiFi pauses
Implementation: Most WiFi/BT combo chips have internal coexistence mechanisms
(MTK/Realtek/Broadcom/Qualcomm each have their own implementations)
Driver-side issues often cause coexistence failures (e.g., your MT7927)
Combo Chips
In consumer electronics, WiFi and BT are almost always on the same chip
MT7921/7925/7927 (MTK)
AX200/AX210 (Intel)
BCM series (Broadcom)
Connect to Host via PCIe/USB/SDIO
The Bluetooth part is usually exposed via a USB HCI interface